(And also have WinCE industrial embedded computers that use the Compact Framework.
NET Winform clients interacting with Java/JBoss middle-tier via Tibco EMS messaging.
That is why they eventually changed the product name from Tibco JMS to Tibco EMS (Enterprise Messaging Service).Īnd I did build heterogeneous software systems around Tibco EMS. And Tibco put the effort into supporting diverse client bindings themselves. It was very evident that Tibco understood messaging much more so than Microsoft. My encounter with Tibco EMS was a much better experience. They depended on 3rd parties to provide MSMQ clients to other platforms. But you know, Microsoft just concerns itself with Windows. I used to work at Microsoft and did some implementation with MSMQ while there. Using JMS For Distributed Software Development
So if you're building a heterogeneous distributed application involving messaging code running on Windows, Unix (AIX/Solaris), Linux, or Mac OS X, then Tibco EMS is the ticket. NET clients - including Compact Framework. I can't begin to say enough good things about Tibco EMS - an implementation of the Java JMS messaging spec. all clients are writing/reading already from the DB, it is just one more table. It adds a point of failure and deployment nightmare (the queue is a point of failure and you need to deal with setting the right permissions on all boxes to read/write messages etc' in Enterprise software you pay in blood for these type of things). (I know what people will say, you can do it by having a red queue and a blue queue.But what if the number/types of queues is dynamic based on the way the application is administrated and changes daily?) When you need to change the logic of the queue to not FIFO, but something like "the oldest RED message" or "the oldest BLUE message" you can't do it. That is in addition to the same SQL server handling the rest of the application stuff.
There is info out there on how to do it, it is very easy and we handled over 200K messages per 24H (with 60x10 = 600 concurrent reads and writes to the queue). Don't reinvent the wheel there, since you will make mistakes (locks). The best solution for us was: Use a SQL Database table as the queue. it becomes hell when you need something not supported. It works great as long as your needs are satisfied. It just doesn't work in the long term because you are giving away the control of your application to Microsoft. We had used inter process communication, we used MSMQ, we tried service broker. The queue is being fed from one other "client". We have distributed system, 60 boxes running each 10 clients all do task X, and they need to take the next task from a queue. but based on real life needs and experience: It keeps on using most of my free RAM is basically dragging down the computer.May not be "best practice" advice here. But nothing happens.īut nothing seems to work. – Then I tried to kill the "Vmmem" process from the task manager. It showed WSL is stopped but the from the taskmanger it still showed "Vmmem" process is still running. It shows WSL is turned off but the Vmmem is still using memory.
Many times in asynchronous messaging, there is a one-way message flow paradigm. From the task manager, I noticed a process named "VMmem" is using more than 70% of my RAM Availability: DataPower Gateway with the TIBCO EMS feature. After a while, I noticed my desktop is running slow and it was out of RAM.
I installed Install Docker Desktop on Windows and started a docker image.